| |
March 4, 2008
I know that this sounds odd coming from me, a long term
Bear, but the Mortgage crisis hitting the Market today
is not as bad as everyone seems to think. Yeah,
consumer spending is going to wane, and yes, business
activity will dry up somewhat for a short while until
this works its way out of the system, but the Mortgage
crisis is not going to hurt the economy for years on
end, and it is not the reason I am a long term Bear.
There's another reason for that.
Look at it this way: If banks indeed get foreclosures at
the worst possible frequency, what is the worst thing
that could happen? We're talking about asset backed
securities. Yeah, there will be losses, but not 100%,
or anything near that. Consider a $10 Billion
portfolio. Assume the entire portfolio gets foreclosed
and returned to the bank (unlikely that the entire
portfolio comes back). Assume that the lending
institution reverses these properties back into the
economy at steep discounts; call it 20%.
That's a $2 Billion hit, and it hurts, but it won't
cripple the lender. In fact, a nimble lender may even
find a way to front run the loan for the foreclosed
property too, thus solidifying revenue streams, albeit
at a lower rate.
Think about Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup.
From a report recently published by the street, Wells
Fargo (WFC) currently holds $33 Billion in Mortgages for
sale; Bank of America (BAC) currently holds about $6
Billion; And Citigroup currently holds about $7.5
Billion worth of mortgages for sale. The balance of
their mortgage portfolios have already been sold to
distribute risk and to free up capital.
|
Company |
Loans Held |
Gross profit '07 |
Cash |
6 month decline |
|
WFC |
$33B |
40.8B |
$25B |
24% |
|
BAC |
$6B |
$102B |
$345B |
25% |
|
C |
$7.5B |
$159B |
$735B |
57% |
Using the 20% estimate, WFC would lose $6.6 Billion in
real assets; BAC could lose $1.2 Billion; C could lose
$1.5 Billion. Losses will also stem from hedge fund
trading errors, and derivative trading miss-steps, so
don't think this is the sum of losses by any means, but
this gives you an idea of the hard asset losses facing
these firms, and this gives you an idea of their
relative ability to stomach those losses. In each
instance, their ability to handle these losses is
significant.
In the near term these firms, and others like them, will
have substantial balance sheet write-downs, but those
won't last forever. In fact, in many cases, these write
downs may be more paper than hard asset losses.
I don't want you to change your thinking long term,
because the Market is headed substantially lower over
time, but not for the reasons facing the Market in
relation to the current Mortgage Mess. The Investment
Rate explains why the Market will fall over time, and it
is the rationale for my long term Bearish Stance, not
the current situation in the economy.
To read more about the Investment Rate click here:
http://www.stocktradersdaily.com/Main/services/investment%20rate.html
Good trading.
Sincerely
Thomas H. Kee Jr.
President and CEO,
Stock Traders Daily.
1.866.213.2067
Disclaimer: You can lose money by investing
in stocks. Past performance also does not
guarantee future results. Do not attempt to
invest in any trading strategy without first
consulting with your trusted investment
advisors. The type of trades made in this
strategy should be deemed to be aggressive
in nature and they are intended to be used
by persons who believe that aggressive
trading suits their personal risk profiles
only
|